Nr. 1/2017MARIO GINESTRA About the suitable tools for the pursuit of the statutory purposes of the Foundation for the Artistic Assets and Activities of the Church. With particular regard to the legal profiles in tax and fiscal matters
Nr. 1/2017GIOVANNI ANGELO LODIGIANI Conscientious objection: an instrument of non-violent cohabitation in pluralistic societỳ. Ethical-theological assumptions
Table of contents
1. Introductory remarks - 2. The facts of the case and the contrast of the decision with the constitutional principle of offensiveness - 3. Some concluding remarks on the judges' questionable invocation of "Western world values" and on the profiles of unconstitutionality of Article 4, paragraph 2, Law No. 110/75.
Abstract
The contribution examines the case decided by the Criminal Court of Cassation, Sec. I, Sentence No. 24084/2017 and traces its arguments in light of the constitutional principle of offensiveness.
Keywords
Religious freedom; Religious symbols; Sikhs; public order; constitutional principle of offensiveness
