Table of contents

1. The distinction between the Catholic Church and states, in the civil enforceability of matrimonial judgments, between absolute incompatibility and relative incompatibility with domestic public order - 2. The complication of the non-univocal identification of public order depending on the different heads of matrimonial nullity - 2.1. The problematic of the delibability of the vice of nullity arising from error in the quality of the person and diversity from intent - 2.2. The problem of the enforceability of nullity from incapacity of the nuptials - 3. Discriminatory treatment between Religions according to the distinct contrast with the internal public order - 3.1. Muslims and Christians. Lebanon, State of Religions with its own Courts - 3.2. Hindus. Civil marriage and religious marriage - 3.3. Shintoism. Japanese propensity for Catholic marriage - 4. Religious treatment discriminated against depending on the non-univocal legal qualification of cases of invalidity/termination of the marriage bond. Community regulation - 4.1. The Supreme Court's contrast with the Italian Constitution and community public policy - 5. The underlying vice, marriage-relationship property protection, which alters the confessional marriage regime