Nr. 1/2016FABIO VECCHI Recensione a Matteo Carnì, Il diritto metropolitico di spoglio sui vescovi suffraganei. Contributo alla storia del diritto canonico ed ecclesiastico nell’Italia meridionale. Prefazione di G. Dalla Torre, Giappichelli, Torino, 2015, pp.I-XII e 1-178
Nr. 2/2018GIOVANNI BATTISTA VARNIER Diego Edigati, Elio Tavilla (a cura di), Giurisdizionalismi. Le politiche ecclesiastiche negli Stati minori della Penisola italiana in età moderna, Aracne, Roma, 2018, pp. 1-236
Summary
1. The introduction of the protection of good faith as a limit to the recognition of ecclesiastical sentences of nullity of marriage - 2. The importance attributed to prolonged conjugal coexistence - 3. The decision under examination.
ABSTRACT
As configured by jurisprudence, the assessment of the requisites of stability and exteriority, necessary to recognize conjugal cohabitation as having actual relevance at the time of the prosecution, ends up by attributing to the judge of the prosecution, and in particular to the Courts of merit, broad discretionary powers, susceptible to significantly affect the possibility of recognition of the ecclesiastical sentence. With the further risk of the formation of differentiated orientations among the various Courts of Appeal, which the nomophylactic function of the Judge of legitimacy cannot provide for, incompetent to intervene, as happened in the present case, on questions considered engrossing assessments of fact and therefore unquestionable in the Supreme Court.
KEYWORDS
Delibation, canonical marriage, principles of public order
