Nr. 1-2022PIERO MARINO Human rights and philosophical realism in the thought of Jacques Maritain
Nr. 1/2021ANTONIO GUARINO Patrimonies destined of religious bodies
Abstract
The work, starting from the interlocutory ordinance n. 1842 of 2022 of the Supreme Court, critically reviews the perspective of legitimacy judges, once again aimed at outlining a different assessment of "altruistic" surrogacy compared to that for "commercial purposes", on the assumption that only the second would be suitable for determining an injury to the dignity of the pregnant woman and an "attack" on the institution of adoption.
Conversely, in overcoming this approach, it is observed that every hypothesis of surrogacy has a "selfish" purpose, being preordained above all to realize the aspiration of the clients to become parents "at any cost", rather than to safeguard the prerogatives of the pregnant and the best interests of the minor involved.
KEY WORDS
Homogenitorial male couple; use of gestation for others; minor born abroad; transcription of foreign birth certificate; “altruistic” surrogacy compared
