Sommario
Premisa – 1. El trámite automático ante el tribunal de apelación – 1.1 Diferencia entre trámite automático y principio del doble grado de jurisdicción – 1.2 Análisis de la norma actual – 1.3 Sentido y contrasentido de la actual normativa: hitos de la reforma – 2. La apelación en sentido estricto – 2.1 La injusticia como base de apelación: critica a la racionalidad de la sentencia – 2.2 Analisis de las normas – 2.3 Puntos inciertos en doctrina y jurisprudencia – 3. La querella de nulidad – 3.1 El gravamen de la “ilegitimidad” – 3.2 Analisis de la norma – 4. El nuevo examen de la causa

Table of contents
Premise – 1. The automatic procedure before the appellate court – 1.1 Difference between automatic procedure and the principle of the double degree of jurisdiction – 1.2 Analysis of the current rules – 1.3 Meaning and contradictions of the current rules: milestones of the reform – 2. The appeal in the strict sense – 2.1 Injustice as a basis for appeal: criticism of the rationality of the sentence – 2.2 Analysis of the rules – 2.3 Uncertain points in doctrine and jurisprudence – 3. The complaint of nullity – 3.1 The gravamen of "illegitimacy" – 3.2 Analysis of the norm – 4. The new proposition of the case

Riassunto
L’articolo delinea il sistema delle impugnazioni contro le sentenze emesse dai tribunali ecclesiastici, focalizzando l’attenzione sul diritto dei fedeli al retto esercizio della potestà giudiziale

Abstract
The paper outlines the system of appeals against judgments issued by ecclesiastical courts, focusing on the right of the faithful to the proper exercise of judicial power